Buckie High wrote:Firstly, the listening environment was shocking, but not in a good way. The system sounded overpowered and poorly time-aligned for the space. The mid-room delay speakers appeared to introduce comb filtering and localization problems rather than improving coverage, while the church’s reverberant architecture exaggerated the lack of clarity. For music where texture, stereo field, and subtle spatial detail are central, the presentation felt fundamentally compromised. I look forward to listening to the digital, vinyl, and cassette versions of Inferno on my hi-fi systems once released before concluding on the overall sonic quality and mix of the album.
I agree absolutely. The acoustics were a bad fit for the session, at least for the particular configuration they used. Vocals are an important element of this album relative to their other work, i was seated right in what should have been the sweet spot in the middle of the audience (just left of the aisle in the center) and I struggled to make the words out most of the time.
Buckie High wrote: Secondly, the Circle-esque, muffled noise that played before the album began was torturous. In fact, at the volume it played at in New York, it was essentially a sonic weapon deployed against the listeners for 30+ minutes. The excessive low-frequency, distorted "hum" could easily cause vestibular and/or psychological distress. I read someone's earlier comment who asked a Warp employee regarding the pre-show audio who confirmed it was created by BoC specifically for these listening sessions. Subjecting fans to this intentionally is sinister.
Here, I respectfully disagree. I thought it was great, it set the mood, and I hope they release it at some point. It’s not for everyone, I’ll grant you, but I’ve attended drone music fests a few times, and they draw a decent turnout. If released, that piece will find an audience.
Buckie High wrote: Thirdly, I would have preferred no visuals rather than the "flaming, rotating, Hexagons of hell" for 60+ minutes. When they changed the visual to the nostalgic "life flashing before your eyes" film clips, it felt lame.
Again I disagree. The brothers pay attention to detail. If they subjected us to an hour of flaming hexagons, that was to get people to focus on LISTENING, and if they changed it up for “You Retreat in Time and Space”, that suggests to me that that track in particular, in context, is key to understanding the album. It’s entirely possible those are Sandison family home movies. To me that part was a welcome, beautiful moment in a fairly heavy experience.
Buckie High wrote: With respect to the album itself: It is impossible to have a properly informed opinion after only one listen in a problematic acoustical environment on a wretched PA system. However, there were only a few fleeting moments that really hit me in a way that their best music over the years has.
The overuse of vocal samples throughout was curious. The drums and synths on many songs were far too harsh and "in your face". The overall soundscape was cold, digital, compressed, and generic. Virtually every chord progression and melody ended in a bizarre, unsettling, and unsatisfying manner. Deep Time (aka "Tape 05") is one of the few examples where a melody resolves in a semi-satisfying way.
I know that many other fans who listened must have had similar thoughts. Many are not willing to allow themselves to admit it, though.
I disagree that the vocal samples were “overused”. Was the music unsettling at various points? Absolutely! But I didn’t find it to be unsatisfying AT ALL. It’s different from their earlier work. That isn’t a bad thing. I’m glad that Mike and Marcus continue to grow and keep their music fresh. I’m sorry the event wasn’t more to your liking, and I agree the acoustics sucked, but other than that, I give the event and the album a big thumbs up.