I think I understood BoC's work.

[Cupz]

You're welcome.

[magrathea_ultima]

Well, that's a LOT of planning and working out details for what was essentially at the time tweens potsing around with synths and musical instruments.

The problem with analysis that are done post-work is that it really is a reflection of one's own interpretation and as such, has to be taken with all the salt in the universe.

Another theory: They just follow musical aesthetics that are mostly molded by their growing up in a western culture of the 70s and 80s and as music would have it, of course it is littered with maths and cycles and whatnot of higher mathematical concepts because, they said it early enough in their body of work: Music is math, Nlogax, etc.

[WATER_CAN-_-]

Here's a de-slopped version of that wall of text for those tl;dr.

The author presents an elaborate esoteric interpretation of the Scottish electronic duo Boards of Canada (BoC), arguing that their work constitutes a modern Atalanta Fugiens—a multimedia initiatory tool designed to guide humanity toward spiritual transcendence. Central to this theory is the concept of "Reality as a Mystical Simulation": a divine "school" where souls evolve through alchemical suffering toward unity with God, moving from the "666" world (materialism, Father and Son without Holy Spirit) to the "777" (Kingdom of Heaven on Earth).

The framework relies heavily on numerology and alchemy. The number 5 represents the Microcosm (Man, the Pentagon), while 6 represents the Macrocosm (Universe, the Hexagon); their union (11) symbolizes transcendence. The author decodes BoC's discography as a deliberate alchemical progression through the five elements: Music Has the Right to Children (Water/1998), Geogaddi (Fire/2002), The Campfire Headphase (Air/2005), Tomorrow's Harvest (Earth/2013), and Inferno (2026) as the Quintessence—the fifth element unifying the previous four. This final album, cataloged as 496 (the third perfect number), allegedly contains the "Golden Key" to humanity's emancipation.

The analysis hinges on "Giraud's Mirror" (track 19), referencing Moebius's Incal and the Möbius strip—symbolizing the eternal rotation between material and celestial consciousness. The author interprets BoC's use of samples, specific track lengths (encoding numbers like 54, 72, 153, 177), and the brothers' initials (M&M = 13² = 169) as evidence of their status as "Two Gods on Earth"—initiated guides transmitting Gnosis through "psychological priming." This connects to a broader "Initiatory ARG" (Alternate Reality Game) spanning sacred architecture (the Pyramids, Paris's chakra-aligned axis), cinema (2001, The Matrix), and current events (9/11 and COVID-19 interpreted as alchemical "Nigredo" phases necessary for collective evolution).

The author posits that BoC's music induces contemplative states to help listeners discover the "code of the Matrix," ultimately revealing that we are God experiencing Himself through individual avatars. The goal is the "Great Work" of alchemy: transmuting the "lead" of ego and ignorance into spiritual gold, achieving the "Christ state" or Philosopher's Stone—a process occurring individually and collectively as humanity exits Plato's Cave.

Could have just said that, but there it is.

In other words, a whole lot of text but nothing new, just rehashing what was said earlier in this thread.

Thanks Cupz for the bot summary!!! It was a really good idea, it's great that you thought of it, and I'm satisfied with what the bot said ^^

Time to puncture a few myths about Boards Of Canada. "The kind of thing that gets up my nose is when people describe us as 'approaching New Age' or soemthing like that," moans Sandison. "To me that's completly missing the point. If we do something that remotely sounds a bit like that, it's because we're actually doing it deliberately, we're doing almost as a pisstake." Google Boards Of Canada and you'll soon find fans with plenty of time on their hands, identifying all manner of psychedelic Easter eggs in the music: reversed samples and tapes, aural palindromes (sentences like "I've been gone about a week" that sound like the same when played forwards or in reverse) buried phrases that hint at paganism ("You Could eel The Sky" contains the words "a god with hooves"). Titles like "Music Is Math", "A Is To B As B Is To C", and "The Smallest Weird Number" (the number 70, which they adopted for the name of their own label/production company, Music70) imply numerological sorcery; musical structures arranged, tuned and sequenced at root level according to mathematical equations such as the Fibonacci sequence and Golden Ratio. Someone's even found that the toal playing time of Geogaddi is 66:06, and it's total hard drive space when ripped to MP3 is 666 megabytes, etc. All of which leads to speculation that they are involved in in some kind of cultish activity - a belief that gathered pace with the release of their 2000 EP In A Beautiful Place Out In The Country, which contained overt references to David Koresh's Branch Davidian community and its annihilation by the US military in 1993 during the Waco siege. "Not in the slightest," counters Sandison when I ask him for a definitive answer on their 'cult' status. "We're just purely coming at what we do from the angle at being interested in subjects. You get a lot of painters or film directors who are complete atheists who'll make films all about religion, or Christianity, not because they're obsessed with the subjects or they're actually evangelists, but just purely because it's something they're interested in for that project. It's exactly the same with us - we'll hit on some of these things, but at the end of the day we're just totally ordinary people that just happen to be making music." And why the particular focus on Waco? "We take a great interest in the spectrum of everything, religions and cults, anything connected to that," says Eoin. Because they are a break from the norm. So when you see something like that, a group of people doing their own thing, going away and living together like that... it's the fascination with that, and a sense of injustice..." "And the outrage at what happened," interjects Sandison. "I'm not a religious person," Eoin continues, "but what I felt seeing what happened there was asense of outrage - they're devoutly religious people, but what happened to them - were they just singled out because of this, and attacked? The victor always writes history, and the only history we know of David Koresh and those people is what's been written about by reference to things like what the FBI were investigating afterwards." "Which was why," Sandison swings back to the record in hand, "we thought we'd make a record that on the surface feels really sweet and very spacious and it'll be titled In A Beautiful Place Out In The Country, but what were these people doing in a beautiful place out in the country? They were getting shot and burned.. [Laughs] It's a typical thing that we would do..." Eoin: "Even when you go away and have that existence, something still chases you there, still follows you home. And that's the impression I get off that story." With every retreat form the world comes the need to protect and survive.

https://bocpages.org/wiki/Protect_and_S ... (interview)

one could fairly say with a high level of confidence BOC are at most mildly spiritual atheists by their own words

BOC words > listener hypotheses

[Cupz]

in other words just a couple of nerds making cool music

[WATER_CAN-_-]

that isn't to suggest that it's not meaningful
I think it's about as loaded with meaning as art can be
but that meaning has a natural basis rather than a supernatural one

[llydia]

its the foundation of many thoughts, thoughts are like water though, to much and you will drown!

[llydia]

Here's a de-slopped version of that wall of text for those tl;dr.

Boards Of Canada: Neon Genesis Evangelion

Could have just said that, but there it is.

In other words, a whole lot of text but nothing new, just rehashing what was said earlier in this thread.

Doing gods work mate. Cheers there!

[HighLowView]

Hi everyone !

Magrathea :
You're absolutely right: our analyses inevitably reflect our interpretations, our projections. We all operate like that, all the time. Even when we're aware of our cognitive biases, well, we still do it... Your messages, to Cupz, Watercan, and you... basically, you're doing the same thing as me! You're projecting your understanding of the world and what you want to see onto your interpretation of the work of BoC.

I'm convinced by my theory about BoC because it's based on numerous elements, some of which are quite strong (Atalanta Fugiens, Giraud’s Mirror & the Incal, 177, 496, 169—in short, everything that demonstrates consistency from beginning to end).
Do you know of any other artists who have such coherence in their work and who, on top of that, offer us « never heard elsewhere » music? Either we are dealing with possibly the greatest geniuses in history, or there is something else going on... or both ?

As for the interview excerpts you showed me, the problem remains the same, and it's already been addressed quite a few times now, so that's the last time I talk about this. Yes, your excerpts greatly weaken my theory, BUT other excerpts greatly strengthen it. So, what do we do? If BoC say "A" in one interview and "B" in another, there's obviously something to be understood. It's up to each of us to interpret what they meant. If we only retain the quotes that fit our own narrative, we're simply engaging in confirmation bias and cherry-picking.

All my interpretations should be taken with a grain of salt. But mathematical correlations don't lie, and neither do the accumulation of esoteric symbols (Atalanta Fugiens, 666 and Inferno tracklist & the "interrogation mark" from TCH²)… that’s why I’m so convinced.


And on another subject, but within the same theme: :

I just rewatched Disclosure Day (which I mentioned in relation to my "199 Prophecy", with the recurrence of the number « 77 » annoncing a great event for this year, and the Jubilee next year).

In the movie, the date of the footage they show worldwide is 7/7/47. Officially it was the day that the US army took control of the place ; the crash happened between the second and the third day of July, so we see another 7/2).
DD = 44, so… maybe, it’s to be linked with the three « 44 » of Aquarius ?

There are a few clues I find overall quite strong that allow us to connect this work to the Initiatory ARG I'm talking about:

-of course, the story itself…

-Some repeated clues with numbers : I didn't bother to write them down because I’m a bit overwhelmed by numbers, but for example :
Channel's name is KCXE4 = 11 3 24 5 4…
11 x 3 = 33  or 11 + 3 = 14 ;
24 + 5 + 4 = 33...
And it also ends with the 5 4 of Inferno ^^

-And also: the remote control is an "elongated hexagon." If that were all, it would be a stretch, but...

-the tire track that the film's antagonist observes at 1:53:40 ("153" ; the vehicule led the heroes in a hidden place) is an hexagonal tiling... There are no lines, nothing but these hexagons. I asked two bots, which told me that this is extremely rare…


As Emily Blunt says at the end :

"The truth belongs to everyone; we all have the right to see and to know."

But it's fortunate that we weren't confronted with this secret decades earlier, because we weren't ready, and it could have unleashed monstrous chaos.
That's why they've been preparing us psychologically for decades, whether it's for extraterrestrials or the "mystical simulation" of reality, and for many other things.

And given that this is Spielberg's 4th film about E.T.s, and considering the almost "cliffhanger" ending… if he’s in the ARG like I believe, maybe it's not impossible that he will do as BoC, and release a 5th film on this subject soon, in "quintessence" mode…


Watercan : what’s the distinction between natural and supernatural, when our science ignores the answer to most of the profund questions we have about the universe, the origin of life & consciousness ?


Llydia : sorry if you felt drown by all my numbers and stuff.
For me, it’s quite the opposite : I was drowning before I started to manipulate this kind of data & knowledge.


See you soon, take care ♥♫

[llydia]

I was drowning before I started to manipulate this kind of data & knowledge.

Edit: You will not escape the boctrix. Zion is a lie! The architect tells the truth!

[Cupz]

I heard Disclosure Day was extremely mid and I would sure hope a dickwad director like Spielberg is not connected to boc. Same for that annoyingly drawn-out written Pluribus show (sure, let the audience here the full quippy voice-mail recording for the 100th time!). If what you are suggesting is cannon I am definitely done with boc. You're dragging their art down when you are connecting it to, imho, lower-quality, run-of-the-mill, by-committee, uninspired, corporate bullshit art. What's next, LOST was in on it too? Jumanji?

I'll go as far as saying the same goes for the Incal in that regard. Yodorowski and moebius are great artists but that comic is pretty rough and contains very shlocky and tropey heroes journey sci-fi. Nothing remotely boc-worthy.

[WATER_CAN-_-]

BOC have stated explicitly that they are atheists

Therefore, the main thrust of your hypothesis is pretty much deflated

The good news is that you're now free to figure out the actual intended meaning should you so choose

I would though advise taking a different approach than before as BOC had heavily cautioned that this type of numerological approach is not likely to yield much in terms of the answers you seek


[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z21PGoy-cQ[/media]

[Wildfire]

You know, I find it funny how tolerance works. I just finished reading the Gender thread in The Playground board, interesting read and was great to see so many supportive comments and general tolerance and understanding for the OP's situation.

But then I come into this thread and it's a very different story, HighLowView is just being himself, playing with numbers, reading (often far too deeply as he himself admits) into things, posting his thoughts and musings, explicitly stating that he concedes he may not be right about it all. And yet it feels like there's an intolerant, group mentality against him. Being told he needs therapy, to stop looking too deeply into things, generally being patronised and ridiculed and shut down, when really he's been nothing but courteous and kind and not been rude to a single person as far as I can see. And bravo to him for sticking the finger up and continuing to post btw. This is after all a discussion board, why are some discussions legitimate and others not?

Just an observation, but it's interesting how one persons self expression should be celebrated and another's should be unsung, often by the exact same people. Why can't we apply the same generosity and kindness to everyone? Or at the very least, just read and move on if it's not for you?

[Cupz]

The amount of pages this thread alone speaks to how tolerable this forum is, and how legitimate this discussion is (though maybe not always in the way intended by OP). People are engaging with what he's saying. Most have very different opinions. Some strongly disagree with what he is saying. But he's posting it, I even read a lot of it.

Personally I'm a bit worried this kind of circular thinking can backfire into paranoid delusions. This particular brand of numberwang just hits a bit toooo close to home for me if you catch my drift, and I don't have to like it. I think calling the brothers "gods" is extremely troublesome so I can't support that personally and I will call it out. But I don't think he shouldn't be allowed to say it or face any repercussions for doing so. Is going "You sure about that? To me that sounds like a load of bull." intolerance?

I hear what you're saying though. I do regret saying he should get professional help, even if I think he should, that's not up to a rando like me. I did mean it with the best of intentions (professional psychological help saved me from a very slow death).

I personally think you're wrong with him being nothing but courteous and kind, but I might be misinterpreting his constant smile.

[Wildfire]

I personally think you're wrong with him being nothing but courteous and kind, but I might be misinterpreting his constant smile.

I think that started when he faced confrontation and so no doubt intended it to irritate. It's all good, we're all just die hard fans, it's sometimes just hard to know when too much analyzing is too much with BOC, but even when it's too much it doesn't merit derision (imo).

[HighLowView]

Thank you so much, Wildfire, for the amazing message you wrote; I really needed it!

But still, most of the reactions here really hurt me.

Cupz: What discussion, anyway? From the beginning, what have your arguments been?

Aside from hurling insults at me, calling me a bot, and attacking all my work as it came from the bot, or always throwing interview excerpts at me that support your point of view (and never respond when given other excerpts that support my point), I haven't really seen any discussion or counter-arguments, from you, Llydia or Watercan.

I did what I could to keep the smile and remain kind, trying to follow my role models, but precisely, I am not them, and now the smile is over.

I feel like I've stumbled upon a bunch of bullies, and the worst part, Cupz, is that you keep trying to portray yourself as a kind person????

Read your messages again, and tell us where the kindness is, for God's sake. You were maybe the most contemptuous person I've talked to in years.

Wildfire is so right about this monumental hypocrisy we see everywhere nowadays, and that you illustrate perfectly.

I'll stop there because I'm done, and right now, I just want to leave this place and not come back.
I am so disappointed by your reactions, I expected anything but this, coming from this forum.

Take care, and sorry for this reaction, I already feel bad for posting this, but I'm only a human, and enough is enough.

Thank you Wildfire and all the other kind persons who supported me and/or who simply spoke to me normally.

Salut.

[Cupz]

This is one of the most active threads on twoism and people are responding to your posts and I do feel quite strongly about this, I would call that discussion. I don't feel like I have to engage in your elaborate systems before I'm allowed to join in that discussion and share my opinion. I in no way intend to be a bully or insulting and if that's the vibe you're getting then I apologize, I am the first to admit I can be a huge fuck-up and a loud mouth too. That said, you can't just make such wild claims about the nature of reality and not expect push-back.

Don't leave though. I've said this before, I think you are very interesting and hope you stick around. I'll shut up here and stick to the other threads if you prefer.

[llydia]

Thank you so much, Wildfire, for the amazing message you wrote; I really needed it!

But still, most of the reactions here really hurt me.

Cupz: What discussion, anyway? From the beginning, what have your arguments been?

Aside from hurling insults at me, calling me a bot, and attacking all my work as it came from the bot, or always throwing interview excerpts at me that support your point of view (and never respond when given other excerpts that support my point), I haven't really seen any discussion or counter-arguments, from you, Llydia or Watercan.

I did what I could to keep the smile and remain kind, trying to follow my role models, but precisely, I am not them, and now the smile is over.

I feel like I've stumbled upon a bunch of bullies, and the worst part, Cupz, is that you keep trying to portray yourself as a kind person????

Read your messages again, and tell us where the kindness is, for God's sake. You were maybe the most contemptuous person I've talked to in years.

Wildfire is so right about this monumental hypocrisy we see everywhere nowadays, and that you illustrate perfectly.

I'll stop there because I'm done, and right now, I just want to leave this place and not come back.
I am so disappointed by your reactions, I expected anything but this, coming from this forum.

Take care, and sorry for this reaction, I already feel bad for posting this, but I'm only a human, and enough is enough.

Thank you Wildfire and all the other kind persons who supported me and/or who simply spoke to me normally.

Salut.

Let me get this straight. You come in here, saying that you love confrontation on the internet and that your soul purpose on this digital domain was to allow it. You then proceed to be met with confrontation, in both forms might I add. Since jokes pointed at an opinion have and always will be a light hearted way to reflect commentary on said opinion, think comedy by John Cleese. Now you don't like it?

You literally came here to get people to agree with you, which was my first issue with this thread entirely. If you are here to write lore dumps about boards of canada, go ahead, I will read you like I read Tolkien. But as I originally said, if you are coming in here spreading fake truths about two very talented artists from Scotland. You should be banned! You are not being a fan, you are using boards of canada, fictional art! as the stepping stone for your own ideology. Unaware that stone is made of painted paper mache.

Edit: This is my 666th post. Numbers mean nothing. Grow up.

[Cupz]

You should be banned!

I strongly disagree. We should all be able to talk about, kiss about and scrutinize and ridicule whatever.

[llydia]

You should be banned!

I strongly disagree. We should all be able to talk about, kiss about and scrutinize and ridicule whatever.

Exactly and the environment here is exactly why we are allowed to share a disagreement on this freely. As well as kiss as much as we want, with out scrunity!