Predictions about future BoC

oyster · Post by **oyster** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:52 pm

God you guys are easy.

Anyway a vocal album would be stupid...would take away a lot from the music itself. Bleh.

Infinite E · Post by **Infinite E** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:48 pm

I don't really know what to think about boc's current direction- on the one hand, the melodies are beautiful and the songs are some of the most complex and multi-layered in all their discography... but call me old-fashioned, but i'd be so happy if they bus out some phat beats and warbly synths on the new record. Or even if they continued in the organic direction, but decayed it all to fuck in a MBV-esque mess... or anynew textural direction for that matter. I'm just not feeling the new timbres they've given their stuff, and if i'm being honest that was a massive part of the appeal when I first started listening to boc.

sad face.

Joebot Kill · Post by **Joebot Kill** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:39 pm

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
Fredd-E wrote:
Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:There won't be any singing on their next album. But that's because the band don't want to do a BOC album with singing on it...
Correct me if I'm wrong, are you implying they are in fact making music with vocals but using another moniker than BoC for it?

yes exactly

interesting... when will there be any info on this? which is further along, this or the new boc? any idea?
ps.
i am enjoying this thread

i choose to believe Najim... i guess im an optimist!

audiotrack · Post by **audiotrack** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:42 pm

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
john fonda wrote: if I long for an update from warp it is because I dislike folk speculating and pretending to be official...
There's a few people I know who have heard some of it though if that counts!

Have they said what its like? If so, what style should we be expecting?

harpoon dodger · Post by **harpoon dodger** » Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:45 pm

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:i'm honestly not pretending to be official, but i do know the band. in answer to fredd-e i havent heard anything from their new album at all, sorry. There's a few people I know who have heard some of it though if that counts! but it is totally concrete that it's coming out soon this year

Thank the starss

Twoism-ist · Post by **Twoism-ist** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:15 am

I do expect an album this year. If you follow the pattern BoC has released their albums, it's about every 3 years, with an EP in between.

oyster · Post by **oyster** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 1:16 am

I sure hope your right. They've yet to dissapoint me.

hexagon son · Post by **hexagon son** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 7:25 am

the campfire headphase and trans canada highway were both delayed, were they not? perhaps they are being a little more careful to avoid leaks/fakes this time around?

IanRedpoint · Post by **IanRedpoint** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 9:45 am

In retrospect, the leaks of TCH left its actual release feeling like a bit of a non-event. I'd be very happy if they can keep whatever they do next completely secret until just before it comes out. Maybe a handful of listening parties in the week before release.

I loved what Radiohead did with In Rainbows. Not so much that they had the pay-what-you-like mp3 release, but more that it didn't leak and came out so soon after being announced. It felt like a proper event. Genuinely exciting, in the way that anticipated record releases used to be.

Najm ad-Din Ayyub · Post by **Najm ad-Din Ayyub** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:52 am

Najm ad-Din Ayyub · Post by **Najm ad-Din Ayyub** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:53 am

Najm ad-Din Ayyub · Post by **Najm ad-Din Ayyub** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:56 am

Mexicola · Post by **Mexicola** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 11:43 am

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:

That (Radiohead) worked because of the nature of their initial download-only release. The problem is that when record companies mail out a handful of early preview copies to journalists, inevitably some of the less scrupulous journos put the record immediately up on the net. And fans simply don't have the willpower to resist a listen. And there you go, the actual release is then spoiled. The only other way around that is to either release the reocrd with zero press coverage (unadvisable) or get in a time machine back to 1980 when new album releases were still huge exciting events.

one other idea of course would be for some extremely clever internet terrorist to develop a virus that constantly evolves and eats the internet from the inside out. then we could all return to the bigger world where people really achieved things instead of squandering their precious life-hours away reading irrelevent shite!

QFT! For that post alone Najm, my respect for you just doubled! lol

And on that note, I'm off out for a walk in the wind and rain with my other half.

zeitgeist · Post by **zeitgeist** » Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:35 pm

i second that motion.

bioluminescence · Post by **bioluminescence** » Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:09 am

Bagpipes.

Archrival · Post by **Archrival** » Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:48 am

I think they will do the same as they did with Squarepusher...the announcement came very close to were you could download the mp3s from bleep.