The longer we wait...

hills west · Post by **hills west** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:45 pm

bleak. wrote:i'm putting the kettle on.

ill enjoy a spot with you eh? sit back, sip and turn our heads back and forth at this senselessness...

bleak. · Post by **bleak.** » Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:10 pm

hills west wrote:
bleak. wrote:i'm putting the kettle on.
ill enjoy a spot with you eh? sit back, sip and turn our heads back and forth at this senselessness...

many cups of tea have been drank as the story unravels...

but seriously, this thread is insane!

hexagon son · Post by **hexagon son** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:14 am

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
Fredd-E wrote:
Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:the fact that they're being silent is down to the fact that they don't see the point putting out irrelevant rubbish. everything else you are apparently projecting onto them.
Ok. You've got a point there. But why do they also keep silent about the recent remix good friday by Why? Do they perhaps think this remix is irrelevant rubbish?

I quote their website twice:
February 2005:
Boards of Canada have contributed a remix to Beck's forthcoming album 'Guero'.
The BOC remix of 'Broken Drum' appears on the deluxe 2-disc version of the album, due out on March 29th 2005.

Oct 2003:
BOC have collaborated with cLOUDDEAD on an ultra-psychedelic alternative version of their forthcoming single 'Dead Dogs Two' to be released in January 2004.
The Boards of Canada remix will be available on the 'Dead Dogs Two" 12"
(available on Jan 26th 2004 in the UK/Europe on Big Dada, and on Jan 27th 2004 in the US on Mush.)
Apparently in the past it was important enough to announce their new remixes. Why i

sn't it important now?

that's true, i think guy who was maintaining their website is living in switzerland for a year and they obviously haven't been keeping up with it

so why the fuck have you been so condescending all this time when you could have just said that? first you say BoC dont have the time to maintain website, then you agree that someone else does it for them after fredd-e says he knows the BoC themselves dont maintain it.

and you still haven't answered my question.

celadon · Post by **celadon** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:49 am

This is great! - things are going to kick off here!!!

I'm spoiling for a fight, me - So come on if you think you're hard enough!!!! You are all bastids!

harpoon dodger · Post by **harpoon dodger** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:03 am

I go away for 5 days and we get another one of these goddamn threads. Can't you morons just have some patience..I mean look how long it took Radiohead to release In Rainbows. I really don't care WHEN boards release their new record as long as they do it sometime. There's plenty of other music to listen to out there.

oyster · Post by **oyster** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:07 am

Najm ad-Din Ayyub, you really not to shut up and get a life.

bioluminescence · Post by **bioluminescence** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:58 am

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
Fredd-E wrote:
Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:the fact that they're being silent is down to the fact that they don't see the point putting out irrelevant rubbish. everything else you are apparently projecting onto them.
Ok. You've got a point there. But why do they also keep silent about the recent remix good friday by Why? Do they perhaps think this remix is irrelevant rubbish?

I quote their website twice:
February 2005:
Boards of Canada have contributed a remix to Beck's forthcoming album 'Guero'.
The BOC remix of 'Broken Drum' appears on the deluxe 2-disc version of the album, due out on March 29th 2005.

Oct 2003:
BOC have collaborated with cLOUDDEAD on an ultra-psychedelic alternative version of their forthcoming single 'Dead Dogs Two' to be released in January 2004.
The Boards of Canada remix will be available on the 'Dead Dogs Two" 12"
(available on Jan 26th 2004 in the UK/Europe on Big Dada, and on Jan 27th 2004 in the US on Mush.)
Apparently in the past it was important enough to announce their new remixes. Why i

sn't it important now?

that's true, i think guy who was maintaining their website is living in switzerland for a year and they obviously haven't been keeping up with it

Well, what about that no2id thingie then?

Cupz · Post by **Cupz** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:02 am

My interpretation of this thread...

...real mature...I know...

ryetronics · Post by **ryetronics** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:32 am

Cupz wrote:My interpretation of this thread...

...real mature...I know...

Ha! Awesome!

Cupz · Post by **Cupz** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:41 am

turquoise70 wrote:i think Ayyub is acting like a condescending asshole.

watch him goooo!

Vordhosbn · Post by **Vordhosbn** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:08 am

Cupz wrote:My interpretation of this thread...

...real mature...I know...

LOL!!!!!

hexagon son · Post by **hexagon son** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:09 am

Vordhosbn wrote:
Cupz wrote:My interpretation of this thread...

...real mature...I know...
LOL!!!!!

sevenELIXIR · Post by **sevenELIXIR** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:31 am

my interest in boc's music and when their next release will be just isn't there anymore. I don't really care. there's too much other good music to listen to.

The Telepathic Kid · Post by **The Telepathic Kid** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:46 am

I think we can all officially say that Paracat has won the internets.

Oliver · Post by **Oliver** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:58 am

Cupz wrote:
Oliver wrote:
john fonda wrote:look what people are left with,askin someone with a made up persona who has said nothin official,desperation,warp practically tell you to fuck off if you mail em bout boc
True, but Najm ad-Din Ayyub is always speaking as if he has inside knowledge. It would be interesting to know if he actually does, or whether he just likes the attention.
Like this quote from THIS thread...

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:
hexagon son wrote:what are your sources for this? i seem to have gotten the impression that they are not workinh together in the same room at the same time anymore from interviews i have read...

that's probably just a misunderstanding from something you read. magazine interviews are not the best place to get info right as they're usually pieced together from dictaphone recordings. - i know the band personally - they still do most of their work at the main studio (they have three studios, and i'm doing something for our next record with them at hexagon sun).

Are you quoting that in order to disprove me? Because about two posts down in the same thread you say that you are sceptical about him.

I must admit I hadn't read that though until you pointed it out. Thanks.

Cupz · Post by **Cupz** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:51 pm

I was helping you out^^

hexagon son · Post by **hexagon son** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:54 pm

Oliver wrote:
Cupz wrote:
Oliver wrote: True, but Najm ad-Din Ayyub is always speaking as if he has inside knowledge. It would be interesting to know if he actually does, or whether he just likes the attention.
Like this quote from THIS thread...

Najm ad-Din Ayyub wrote:

that's probably just a misunderstanding from something you read. magazine interviews are not the best place to get info right as they're usually pieced together from dictaphone recordings. - i know the band personally - they still do most of their work at the main studio (they have three studios, and i'm doing something for our next record with them at hexagon sun).
Are you quoting that in order to disprove me? Because about two posts down in the same thread you say that you are sceptical about him.

I must admit I hadn't read that though until you pointed it out. Thanks.

Najm ad-Din Ayyub, what is your recording/artist/band name? just curious...

Oliver · Post by **Oliver** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:05 pm

Cupz wrote:I was helping you out^^

Oh, thanks.

This thread has got a little crazy now though. Who really cares whether he's legitimate? Take what he says with a pinch of salt and if it turns out to be true then we can believe what he says more next time.

Cupz · Post by **Cupz** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:35 pm

Oliver wrote:...if it turns out to be true then we can believe what he says more next time.

How can it turn out to be true?

How can you proof you know the band personally

Oliver · Post by **Oliver** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:52 pm

Cupz wrote:
Oliver wrote:...if it turns out to be true then we can believe what he says more next time.
How can it turn out to be true? How can you proof you know the band personally

Sorry, what I meant was that if he says something concrete about a release or whatever (unlikely) and then it turns out to be true, we should take him more seriously in future.

As it is now, I doubt he knows much more than the rest of us.