Old Casettes

dave_from_2001 · Post by **dave_from_2001** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 6:41 am

the letter p wrote:I saw this on another forum.

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?app=co ... h_id=18928

error message here. WOAH (tamales)

Opothecary · Post by **Opothecary** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 11:47 am

dave_from_2001 wrote:
the letter p wrote:I saw this on another forum.

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?app=co ... h_id=18928

error message here. WOAH (tamales)

You'll need a WATMM login - it's just more angles of the AFOT sleeve. The pictures include the inner flap of the sleeve, which I don't think I've seen before, but it's just the full photo from the cover of Hi Scores.

dave_from_2001 · Post by **dave_from_2001** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 4:49 pm

Opothecary wrote:
dave_from_2001 wrote:
the letter p wrote:I saw this on another forum.

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?app=co ... h_id=18928

error message here. WOAH (tamales)

You'll need a WATMM login - it's just more angles of the AFOT sleeve. The pictures include the inner flap of the sleeve, which I don't think I've seen before, but it's just the full photo from the cover of Hi Scores.

Perhaps an mp3 is encoded within the image.

turquoise70 · Post by **turquoise70** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:05 pm

dave_from_2001 wrote:
Perhaps an mp3 is encoded within the image.

oscillik · Post by **oscillik** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:09 pm

dave_from_2001 wrote:
Opothecary wrote:
dave_from_2001 wrote:
the letter p wrote:I saw this on another forum.

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?app=co ... h_id=18928

error message here. WOAH (tamales)

You'll need a WATMM login - it's just more angles of the AFOT sleeve. The pictures include the inner flap of the sleeve, which I don't think I've seen before, but it's just the full photo from the cover of Hi Scores.

Perhaps an mp3 is encoded within the image.

if you pass it through several filters, and run a harmonic rotation on there at the right frequency, you can actually get an OSCar out of the picture.

get em while they're still hot!

Moebius · Post by **Moebius** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:24 pm

the letter p wrote:I saw this on another forum.

http://forum.watmm.com/index.php?app=co ... h_id=18928

I assume that's Joyrex's tape? Could you link to the actual thread, please.

plazz · Post by **plazz** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:28 pm

This is the thread: http://forum.watmm.com/topic/48054-a-fe ... nes-vol-1/ (image is posted on page 4).

Not sure if it's real or if he's making a point how easy it is to fake?

Retrodreaming · Post by **Retrodreaming** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:34 pm

the letter p · Post by **the letter p** » Thu Aug 20, 2009 9:47 pm

"C'est fini la comédie"

polar sky · Post by **polar sky** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 1:00 am

I think it's all bullshit, but who really knows.

the letter p · Post by **the letter p** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:33 am

"C'est fini la comédie"

bleak. · Post by **bleak.** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:37 am

interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

oscillik · Post by **oscillik** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 10:37 am

bleak. wrote:interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

well since these tracks were never meant for public consumption, and that we're to assume that BoC are still working on a BoXset, then why would mdg come in on this convo?

get on the mystery machine and enjoy the ride

Skydiver · Post by **Skydiver** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:03 pm

"You can either keep chasing an elusive past, relying on your fans' nostalgia, or you can press on, keeping your gaze fixed forward."

This....from a review in the Guardian for the Artic Monkeys new LP seemed to strike a chord, what with everyone gasping for a BoC Boxset and new LP and the like.

Skydiver.

bleak. · Post by **bleak.** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:25 pm

oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

well since these tracks were never meant for public consumption, and that we're to assume that BoC are still working on a BoXset, then why would mdg come in on this convo?

get on the mystery machine and enjoy the ride

to confirm that this is intact legit? in the sense that the tracks ARE written by boc despite being released without their permission.

oscillik · Post by **oscillik** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:22 pm

bleak. wrote:
oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

well since these tracks were never meant for public consumption, and that we're to assume that BoC are still working on a BoXset, then why would mdg come in on this convo?

get on the mystery machine and enjoy the ride

to confirm that this is intact legit? in the sense that the tracks ARE written by boc despite being released without their permission.

again, why would he confirm or deny?

if the tracks appear on a possible future release of old BoC stuff in a BoCset, then you'll know they were BoC all along. if the tracks don't appear on a possible future BoCset then you can believe what you want to believe.

if no BoCset ever shows up, you can still believe what you want to believe.

it's music. if you like it, who cares who it's made by?

Opothecary · Post by **Opothecary** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:39 pm

bleak. wrote:
oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

well since these tracks were never meant for public consumption, and that we're to assume that BoC are still working on a BoXset, then why would mdg come in on this convo?

get on the mystery machine and enjoy the ride

to confirm that this is intact legit? in the sense that the tracks ARE written by boc despite being released without their permission.

PC and Red Moss showed up in the Invocation video...good enough for me.

bleak. · Post by **bleak.** » Fri Aug 21, 2009 8:20 pm

oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:
oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

well since these tracks were never meant for public consumption, and that we're to assume that BoC are still working on a BoXset, then why would mdg come in on this convo?

get on the mystery machine and enjoy the ride

to confirm that this is intact legit? in the sense that the tracks ARE written by boc despite being released without their permission.

again, why would he confirm or deny?

if the tracks appear on a possible future release of old BoC stuff in a BoCset, then you'll know they were BoC all along. if the tracks don't appear on a possible future BoCset then you can believe what you want to believe.

if no BoCset ever shows up, you can still believe what you want to believe.

it's music. if you like it, who cares who it's made by?

why would he confirm or deny? there's hundreds of topics based on old tunes speculations based on the internet, i suppose a few words from mdg would rest the case somewhat? obviously we have very different opinions on this!

bluesky · Post by **Fredd-E** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 7:39 am

scan provided by dealer:

click image for full resolution

versus

scan provided by phalam:

click image for full resolution

Two conflicting scans.

I've updated the bocpages with this new info: http://bocpages.org/wiki/Old_Tunes_Vol._1#Background

Either one of those two scans is a fake or BoC just used two different labels for the same cassette. I reckon it's the latter.

oscillik · Post by **oscillik** » Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:19 am

bleak. wrote:
oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:
oscillik wrote:
bleak. wrote:interesting that mdg has completely evaded this discussion..

well since these tracks were never meant for public consumption, and that we're to assume that BoC are still working on a BoXset, then why would mdg come in on this convo?

get on the mystery machine and enjoy the ride

to confirm that this is intact legit? in the sense that the tracks ARE written by boc despite being released without their permission.

again, why would he confirm or deny?

if the tracks appear on a possible future release of old BoC stuff in a BoCset, then you'll know they were BoC all along. if the tracks don't appear on a possible future BoCset then you can believe what you want to believe.

if no BoCset ever shows up, you can still believe what you want to believe.

it's music. if you like it, who cares who it's made by?

why would he confirm or deny? there's hundreds of topics based on old tunes speculations based on the internet, i suppose a few words from mdg would rest the case somewhat? obviously we have very different opinions on this!

either you're not reading my posts, or you really don't get what i'm saying.