Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:29 am
zander I like the nacreous avatar
but what about artificial vinyl static or some kind of tape noise...staggboy wrote:Don't want to pee on anyone's parade, but you can hear vinyl static on it... I believe Catalog 3 was only produced on cassette and then later CD, yes?
Nice track though, for sure!
Yeah, it's definitely surface noise. I think the idea that they'd put the noise on to cover the fact that's tape is just wishful thinking.Fredd-E wrote:but what about artificial vinyl static or some kind of tape noise...staggboy wrote:Don't want to pee on anyone's parade, but you can hear vinyl static on it... I believe Catalog 3 was only produced on cassette and then later CD, yes?
Nice track though, for sure!
all is possible, imho
How stupid can you get with an opinion like that, shame on you.easterlingman wrote:i can't... it just vaguely reminded me.. probably has nothing to do with him, as he's american and all british people hate americans
yeah, it's especially stupid because i'm being completely serious and not joking at all. in fact, i have no sense of humor whatsoever.ExitEuXa wrote:How stupid can you get with an opinion like that, shame on you.easterlingman wrote:i can't... it just vaguely reminded me.. probably has nothing to do with him, as he's american and all british people hate americans
the noise is really vynil surface and i kinda doubt that it's added just for the sake of it. so, yes, wishful thinking it is. perhaps the track is not "stowed under" but on the other hand, it might still be a track by boc that we have never known about in the first place. the "catalogue 3" catalog number is CANC19, "acid memories" is CANC27. and just look at the rest of the releases. there definitely are many more we don't know about. so, unil someone says for a fact that this track is not by boc, i'll remain convinced it is.BunnyRabbit wrote: Yeah, it's definitely surface noise. I think the idea that they'd put the noise on to cover the fact that's tape is just wishful thinking.
...despite there being no factual evidence whatsoever.subset wrote: unil someone says for a fact that this track is not by boc, i'll remain convinced it is.
Thanks, it's from Antarctica. And I like your use of the word "nacreous."sevenELIXIR wrote:zander I like the nacreous avatar
I agree. I definitely think it is out there somewhere. Whether someone should upload it though is another matter.polar sky wrote:I just don't understand how all this info is up about these albums and still after years and years, nothing is on the net. I mean closes vol. 1 was re-pressed on cd in 1997! That has to be floating around somewhere, and I don't care who BoC trusts, there has to be a rat somewhere waiting to upload...
Of course, with their hesitation about it so far, it's obvious money isn't what they're after. I think they're looking to release a quality product. Perhaps they think that their old material isn't worth the time and we're not going to like a lot of it. But at the same time, a lot of BOC fans have favorite tracks from the old tunes tapes! I'm one of them. I am guessing that the stuff on these unreleased albums is actually going to be better than the stuff on these old tunes tapes so they should get on it.fumi wrote:I agree. I definitely think it is out there somewhere. Whether someone should upload it though is another matter.polar sky wrote:I just don't understand how all this info is up about these albums and still after years and years, nothing is on the net. I mean closes vol. 1 was re-pressed on cd in 1997! That has to be floating around somewhere, and I don't care who BoC trusts, there has to be a rat somewhere waiting to upload...
If I was BOC, I would certainly start think about slowly releasing back catalogue stuff over the next few years. A nice tidy earner for themselves (and Warp).
Regards
Really?fumi wrote:I agree about the money thing but only because they are in a position where money is obviously not an issue.
Maybe you're right. I dunno really.wwbjd wrote:Really?fumi wrote:I agree about the money thing but only because they are in a position where money is obviously not an issue.
I know and have worked with a lot of musicians, who have released many albums, usually have a "cult" following, done commercial work, etc.. yet they still have to hold down one, if not two "real" jobs to fund their recordings.
I hope money isn't an issue for themBut.. ya know.. sometimes when you don't have something.. and want something REALLY BAD, constantly working towards a goal, the end result far surpases your wildest dreams.
Hell, look at BT. I used to like him, then he got all rich and bleached. Now he sucks a fucking donkey sack.
You can ride it if you'd like..fumi wrote:BT? Sorry dude, you lost me now. I do like the lyrics to 'Bike' in your sig though.