Kaleidoscope

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

Guest

Post by Guest »

D4VERD4NN wrote:
zander two wrote:You know, it's a damn shame that the great and powerful Fredd-E doesn't have a kaleidoscope, while there's some yutz out there, who isn't even on a message board (of canada) that does have one. It makes me angry. :x
A very nice remark :!: :x

The great and powerfull Fredd-E :?: :!: :lol:
What do you mean by that :?: :lol:
User avatar
zander two
Sherbet Head
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:42 am

Post by zander two »

What the hell is going on here?
Guest

Post by Guest »

zander two wrote:What the hell is going on here?
Hell i suppose :!: :wink:
User avatar
zander two
Sherbet Head
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:42 am

Post by zander two »

loga (xn) = n loga x wrote:
Cupz wrote:
zander two wrote:You know, it's a damn shame that the great and powerful Fredd-E doesn't have a kaleidoscope, while there's some yutz out there, who isn't even on a message board (of canada) that does have one. It makes me angry. :x
Agreed...Only BoCers schould be aloud to have 1....
Well you make me angry, people who aren't on a message board about BoC shouldn't be allowed one? That's pathetic, not everyone has access to a computer, or has the time or knowlege. I didn't up untill a while ago when I started my new job, and I obviously shouldn't even be on here, I should be working. I don't know what BoCers are? but if that means someone that likes BoC, not every BoC fan is going to have access to the internet, grow up! It's so difficult trying to obtain BoC stuff, or satisfy your interests about them if you don't have it. So for anyone without the internet, it's a lot harder to be a BoC fan. And that deserves respect! NOT OH YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE A KALIEDOSCOPE BECAUSE YOUR NOT ON A MESSAGE BOARD!


ok, I got my view accross...... happy new year!
Should I pick this poor bastard's statement apart, or should I simply reply by asking just what the fuck does any of this have to do with Boards of Canada? Let's take a vote!
loga (xn) = n loga x
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:14 am
Location: England

Post by loga (xn) = n loga x »

[/quote]
Should I pick this poor bastard's statement apart, Let's take a vote![/quote]

Oh pick it apart, go on.

Vote1: "pick this poor bastard's statement apart"
Last edited by loga (xn) = n loga x on Mon Jan 09, 2006 11:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Considerable information capable of informing decisions and guiding actions is perceived even when observers do not experience any awareness of perceiving.
loga (xn) = n loga x
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:14 am
Location: England

Post by loga (xn) = n loga x »

Cupz wrote:
steve-o wrote:Another perfect example of someone who does not understand the word "SARCASIM". Relax, really. No one is excluding you because you don't have readily available internet access.
I could not say it better myself :)
Well.. I guess "SARCASIM" must be different in the US, I apologize, allow me to elaborate as to why I was so grossly mistaken. You see in the UK "SARCASIM" doesn’t really work if it’s written down as there is no way of telling that the ‘super intelligent, quick witted enough to be sarcastic on a message board person’ is actually being sarcastic. Obviously I’m not as intelligent as you, as I was of the understanding that unless you write down ‘the following is a sarcastic remark’ or ‘I was being sarcastic’ it was only possible to tell through body language, tone of voice, or facial expression. Clearly your superior humor is above me, and so allow me to apologize again. England is obviously still in the dark ages, compared with America, we have a saying as follows ‘sarcasm is the lowest from of wit’ yet the lowest from of wit quotation doesn't appear in Penguin Dictionary of Quotations or the Modern Quotations nor in the Oxford dictionary. I now humble my self to you publicly. I have made a mental memo for future reference, not to question anything else that you may say. As I have only a vague idea on how this “SARCASM” thing works, particularly on a message board(s of Canada) < by the way, putting “s of Canada” after “message board”…. hilarious, simply hilarious, I wouldn’t have thought of that. Which is just another example of how much further ahead you are in the expertise of “SARCASM” … genius.
Considerable information capable of informing decisions and guiding actions is perceived even when observers do not experience any awareness of perceiving.
User avatar
Cupz
High Scorer
Posts: 10649
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Cupz »

ok next time i make a sarcastic responce,I`ll do this:

"The following statement is sarcastic and should not be taken seriously in any way"
Throw away your smartphone.
User avatar
steve-o
Sherbet Head
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: on the farm
Contact:

Post by steve-o »

loga (xn) = n loga x wrote:
Cupz wrote:
steve-o wrote:Another perfect example of someone who does not understand the word "SARCASIM". Relax, really. No one is excluding you because you don't have readily available internet access.
I could not say it better myself :)
Well.. I guess "SARCASIM" must be different in the US, I apologize, allow me to elaborate as to why I was so grossly mistaken. You see in the UK "SARCASIM" doesn’t really work if it’s written down as there is no way of telling that the ‘super intelligent, quick witted enough to be sarcastic on a message board person’ is actually being sarcastic. Obviously I’m not as intelligent as you, as I was of the understanding that unless you write down ‘the following is a sarcastic remark’ or ‘I was being sarcastic’ it was only possible to tell through body language, tone of voice, or facial expression. Clearly your superior humor is above me, and so allow me to apologize again. England is obviously still in the dark ages, compared with America, we have a saying as follows ‘sarcasm is the lowest from of wit’ yet the lowest from of wit quotation doesn't appear in Penguin Dictionary of Quotations or the Modern Quotations nor in the Oxford dictionary. I now humble my self to you publicly. I have made a mental memo for future reference, not to question anything else that you may say. As I have only a vague idea on how this “SARCASM” thing works, particularly on a message board(s of Canada) < by the way, putting “s of Canada” after “message board”…. hilarious, simply hilarious, I wouldn’t have thought of that. Which is just another example of how much further ahead you are in the expertise of “SARCASM” … genius.
Thank you for your understanding.....We now return to our regularly scheduled program.....
Last edited by steve-o on Mon Jan 09, 2006 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cupz
High Scorer
Posts: 10649
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Cupz »

Thats enough....this conversation is not leading anywhere :P
Throw away your smartphone.
User avatar
zander two
Sherbet Head
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:42 am

Post by zander two »

In an effort to clear things up, and hopefully end this bullshit once and for all, allow me to attempt to restate my original point. All I was trying to say was that after all Fredd-E has done for the BoC fan community, he deserves to be one of the lucky few to possess one of the rarest of BoC items. A lot of us "Obsessive Freaks," and "Crazy Geogadders" have Fredd-E (as well as David AC) to credit for fostering our obsession with our favorite band. If you have a problem with that, you are simply proving my point in my original post. Thank you.
User avatar
Cupz
High Scorer
Posts: 10649
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Cupz »

You forgot Campfire headface`s :P
Throw away your smartphone.
loga (xn) = n loga x
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 35
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:14 am
Location: England

Post by loga (xn) = n loga x »

Cupz wrote:You forgot Campfire headface`s :P
do you think that's their best album?
Considerable information capable of informing decisions and guiding actions is perceived even when observers do not experience any awareness of perceiving.
User avatar
Cupz
High Scorer
Posts: 10649
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Cupz »

No...I think MHTRTC is their best....but all are great :P
Throw away your smartphone.
User avatar
steve-o
Sherbet Head
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: on the farm
Contact:

Post by steve-o »

loga (xn) = n loga x wrote:
Cupz wrote:You forgot Campfire headface`s :P
do you think that's their best album?

I do
DocteurOrlof
Posts Quantity
Posts: 195
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: France

Post by DocteurOrlof »

loga (xn) = n loga x wrote:
Cupz wrote:You forgot Campfire headface`s :P
do you think that's their best album?
Looks like we're gonna have a new poll here... 8)
User avatar
steve-o
Sherbet Head
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: on the farm
Contact:

Post by steve-o »

Got my Kalidescope today. "they glow with all the colors of the rainbow" very nice.
User avatar
Derail
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1939
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 5:38 pm
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by Derail »

steve-o wrote:Got my Kalidescope today. "they glow with all the colors of the rainbow" very nice.
Dammit, now I want one! :cry:
Image
User avatar
Derail
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1939
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 5:38 pm
Location: Pittsburgh

Post by Derail »

:D I'm stoked, I just snagged one off Ebay for $75. I was shocked to discover I was the only bidder. :shock:
Image
User avatar
Cupz
High Scorer
Posts: 10649
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:15 pm

Post by Cupz »

Congratulations my friend :)
Throw away your smartphone.
User avatar
Aesthetics
Site Admin
Posts: 5446
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2004 11:59 am
Location: Lowlands
Contact:

Post by Aesthetics »

Derail wrote::D I'm stoked, I just snagged one off Ebay for $75. I was shocked to discover I was the only bidder. :shock:
The only bidder and still $75? It still is a lot of cash for this awesome gadget imo.
Life is a Frequency
Post a reply