Page 1 of 1

Fukushima

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:33 am
by saturdayindex
I think this deserves its own thread here on Twoism, because I believe the threat of Fukushima is growing ever greater and is beginning to threaten not only Japan but the entire Pacific Ocean and even the west coast of the Americas.

Has everyone alerted themselves to this impending nuclear crisis? It's not at all unlikely that a massive chain reaction will occur at Fukushima within the next several years, as there are already cracks all over the plant and hundreds of thousands of tons of water leakage into the Pacific Ocean.

I'm normally a moderate person and don't get scared of things too easily. Even in the instance of the Cold War, the fear of nuclear disaster rested in the hands of agents of the government in whose hands was the ability to use nuclear power to destroy. There was always the hope that nuclear power would be the last resort, and thankfully, a nuclear attack never happened.

However, the containment of the water containing radioactive isotopes in Fukushima is an even riskier situation, because it is hardly within human means to avert the dangers in this case. That scares me, just a little bit.

The resulting fallout from this chain reaction would be much, much worse than what happened at Chernobyl.

What do you guys think of all this?



Here's a map of the predicted outfall via wind/ocean currents:
Image

Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 4:03 am
by futureling
It is a scary situation. I am just a layman at these things, but I find these articles to be informative:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... =pm_latest

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... yl-5398286

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:03 am
by cubistking1906
futureling wrote:It is a scary situation. I am just a layman at these things, but I find these articles to be informative:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... =pm_latest

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... yl-5398286
Excellent articles and a very significant topic.

I'm more concerned with this type of thing happening again in another place than I am with Fukushima itself. The damage is done there and there's not much we can do about it except contain it. It's obviously time to learn safer ways of harvesting energy as well as quickly improve the structures of existing nuclear sites. And the global community still needs to take the situation seriously and come together to properly contain what's left of the radiation.

To my knowledge it's still not as bad as Chernobyl was and is not likely to meltdown any further to the point of more explosions or a full uncontrolled chain reaction.

Here's another excellent article on the incident from shortly after it occurred for any who are interested:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/s ... -aftermath

Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:59 pm
by Neurotangent
cubistking1906 wrote:
futureling wrote:It is a scary situation. I am just a layman at these things, but I find these articles to be informative:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... =pm_latest

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science ... yl-5398286
Excellent articles and a very significant topic.

I'm more concerned with this type of thing happening again in another place than I am with Fukushima itself. The damage is done there and there's not much we can do about it except contain it. It's obviously time to learn safer ways of harvesting energy as well as quickly improve the structures of existing nuclear sites. And the global community still needs to take the situation seriously and come together to properly contain what's left of the radiation.

To my knowledge it's still not as bad as Chernobyl was and is not likely to meltdown any further to the point of more explosions or a full uncontrolled chain reaction.

Here's another excellent article on the incident from shortly after it occurred for any who are interested:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/s ... -aftermath
General Electric built the reactors and it was recommended early on that TEPCO replace a potentially serious flaw that was discovered in the design, but it never happened. Negligence more than incompetence is to blame for Fukushima. http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fukushima ... d=13141287

With regard to nuclear energy at large, though, I think it's our best bet as a large-scale energy solution to carbon fuel dependency in the short-term. Thorium is also increasingly being looked at as a viable, less-radioactive candidate than uranium for nuclear fission. It's important to keep in mind though that the total environmental damage caused by uncontained radiation from fission plants pales in comparison to the total damage, not even counting damage yet to come, from carbon fuels. The risk factor between the two is comparable to that between cars and airplanes. Airplane crashes are large and scary and draw a lot of attention but they are magnitudes less likely than car crashes, car for car and plane for plane. We can use fission as a stepping stone to fusion and other more technologically-efficient renewable energy sources -- there's no need for fission to be a permanent affair, but it's absolutely needed in the short-term. It just requires the strictest oversight imaginable.

Posted: Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:10 pm
by saturdayindex
This is getting worse.

Milk tested across the United States has now been found to contain radiation levels 2000 times higher than EPA maximums.

Shit's about to hit the fan, and nobody is talking about it. This needs to make headlines.

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:54 am
by Aesthetics
I can't comprehent this. This stuff is going on for a long while now and the world is watching...
The US covernment / UN is concerned about Libia but didn't reach out to Japan when needed.