____twoism

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:46 pm**

This occurred to me after listening to 'From One Source All Things Depend'
(the last track from the Japanese release of Geogaddi).
A lot of the music (from Geogaddi in particular) is related to the theory of the '[wiki]Golden Ratio[/wiki]', a mathemetical equation that applies to every naturally occurring organism on the planet.
Somehow I find it hard to imagine the brothers being the god bothering types..

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:58 pm**

Yeah. They're both Seventh Day Adventists. The track "Rue The Whirl" is about God's providence.

Check it out, it's all on Bocpages.org.

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:21 pm**

Seventh Day Adventists? Seriously?

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:29 pm**

*cough*sarcasm*cough*

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:45 pm**

ollie i can't get over how sexy that icon is

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:49 pm**

Mike Sandison: "We are a bit ritualistic, although not religious at all. We're not really conscious of it in our music but I can see that it is happening. We're interested in symbols."

NME Interview @ BocPages

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 5:00 pm**

I'm not sure how you draw the connection between awareness of the golden ratio and being creationist.

Posted: **Tue Dec 08, 2009 6:07 pm**

i'm just bein an asshole

Posted: **Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:32 am**

They are hardcore Scientologists and if they release any more music they will be zapped by thetan lazer beams.

Posted: **Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:27 am**

Pew, pew!

Posted: **Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:48 pm**

Treefingers wrote:Pew, pew!

Posted: **Thu Dec 10, 2009 10:09 pm**

They are much more likely to be evolutionists. They are rationalists certainly. and believe firmly in science, a subject that creationists clearly disregard! I think they would know that the earth is older than 4000 years old and we didn't walk with dinosaurs!

Posted: **Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:28 pm**

red moon wrote:They are much more likely to be evolutionists. They are rationalists certainly. and believe firmly in science, a subject that creationists clearly disregard! I think they would know that the earth is older than 4000 years old and we didn't walk with dinosaurs!

LOL!!!!

Posted: **Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:21 am**

guys let's do another science vs religion debate up in here, the last one went so well

Posted: **Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:26 pm**

turquoise70 wrote:guys let's do another science vs religion debate up in here, the last one went so well

Erm ok...

Evolution can be seen in action, just look at common pet dog. They are proof that over 15000 years humans have taken wolves and created many types of breed, shapes and sizes, created by selective breading, based on the work of Gregor Mendel, proving that like it or not, evolution is present.

If evolution is noncence than how did all these breeds of dog occur?

and please note, that in the case of dogs, determenation of the fitest specimen was made by humans and not by the environment, but the same mechanism for evolution is present.

[EDIT: I should have mentioned that I dont know a whole lot about cristian belief, but im interested to see how it conflitct with my statements above]

Posted: **Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:52 pm**

Pantheon wrote:
Erm ok...

Evolution can be seen in action, just look at common pet dog. They are proof that over 15000 years humans have taken wolves and created many types of breed, shapes and sizes, created by selective breading, based on the work of Gregor Mendel, proving that like it or not, evolution is present.

If evolution is noncence than how did all these breeds of dog occur?

and please note, that in the case of dogs, determenation of the fitest specimen was made by humans and not by the environment, but the same mechanism for evolution is present.

[EDIT: I should have mentioned that I dont know a whole lot about cristian belief, but im interested to see how it conflitct with my statements above]

Actually, that's only half of the evolution story. I don't think many christians will deny this part. It's only some kind of filtering of the gene pool. BTW There's also a big downside on this selective breeding, many dog breeds have specific condition, like hip dysplasia in bernese mountain dogs. In selecting certain traits in a dog, often bad genes come along, it's a bit like inbreeding.

The interesting part starts with adding genes to gene pool I think.....

(maybe this has become a playgroud topic now.....)

turquoise70 wrote:guys let's do another science vs religion debate up in here, the last one went so well

Love to... (same sarcastic mode as turquoise70 I think)

Posted: **Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:03 pm**

i apologize deeply to all of twoism for being facetious when i knew well and good irony doesn't work on people with strong metaphysical beliefs. now we're gonna have to suffer through this again and it's my fault. i'm gonna buy you all sandwiches for this... sorry...

Posted: **Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:19 pm**

Pantheon wrote:
turquoise70 wrote:guys let's do another science vs religion debate up in here, the last one went so well
Erm ok...

Evolution can be seen in action, just look at common pet dog. They are proof that over 15000 years humans have taken wolves and created many types of breed, shapes and sizes, created by selective breading, based on the work of Gregor Mendel, proving that like it or not, evolution is present.

If evolution is noncence than how did all these breeds of dog occur?

and please note, that in the case of dogs, determenation of the fitest specimen was made by humans and not by the environment, but the same mechanism for evolution is present.

[EDIT: I should have mentioned that I dont know a whole lot about cristian belief, but im interested to see how it conflitct with my statements above]

someone been watching it's only a theory? brilliant program and somewhat frustrated that the series has ended!

Posted: **Sat Dec 12, 2009 8:50 am**

its all fractals guys. Evolution, macro-space and micro-space. I think BoC know a little something about fractals;

You mentioned Chaos a moment ago. Are you interested in Chaos Theory - sciences that are a little offbeat?
"Yeah. Fractals. I don't know why, but strange sciences have always fascinated us."

Posted: **Sat Dec 12, 2009 9:49 am**

I think BoC aren't creationists nor evolutionists. They look beyond those concepts, and that's why I like them!
It all comes down to theories and common sense when we talk about these subjects. Choose life, choose what you believe. I think it's healthy to stay open to other beliefs/ theories. It's healthy to doubt your morals and beliefs. It makes you a more balanced human.

And Cole, I'm ready for your sandwhich now. A Bacon, egg, cheese-sandwich please.

____twoism

Are BOC creationists?

Are BOC creationists?