No. Dude. See this movie at an Imax. It will melt your fucking face!turquoise70 wrote:passionately articulated, but i still think i'm just gonna save the 15 bucks and buy Mr Fox twice when it comes out on DVD. i'd rather -not- know what everyone's raving about. i'd rather in 30 years when people ask "oh man and remember avatar?" i can be like "no."Joebot Kill wrote:i saw avatar in IMAX last night. I highly recommend it, even to people who have already seen it in 3d. the blurriness that existed in the standard resolution is gone. its pretty much pure visual perfection.
i dont know how to accurately state my opinion on this movie. i have always been generally anti-cgi. i think most of the time it ruins the movie. i always think of it as the easy way out of what could have been a creative solution to the problem. but in avatar, the cgi is the star of the film. and the movie cost 300 million dollars to make. do you really think they could afford to write a story that was more than generic? thats a huge gamble. they needed to come up with a story that was purely accessibly for everyone.
this isn't a hip indie film. this is one of the most expensive movies that will probably ever be made. the plot IS pandering. and there is a lot of action and a lot of explosions! but is it fun to look at? you bet! the characters are TOTALLY black and white. but do you care about them? surprisingly, yes! the bad guy is one of the best i've seen in a while! the only character i didn't like was that nerdy guy. that actor just sucked.
and for the record, in my opinion, district 9 was still a better movie. but it didn't do as well in theaters. when a movie costs 300 million, you need to make sure that everyone can get into it.
also, while i'm at it, fantastic mr. fox is the best movie i've seen in years. no CGI in that, all stop animation! absolute beauty! i loved it more than avatar, but guess what, it did terribly in the box office as well! go figure.
i recommend everyone shell out the 15 bucks it takes to see avatar in IMAX-3D. because once it's out of theaters, you have lost your chance to see it this way. it's not like you can rent the dvd and get what everyone was talking about. so just see it while it's still playing. its a fun movie!
Avatar
Moderator: Aesthetics
- Chuck Beckles
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:12 pm
OH OK! NOW THAT IS FUNNY! You are really good... I'm watching out for you! Wes Anderson's Avatar! Wow... man, good stuff.dave_from_2001 wrote:I posted the Wes Anderson version of Avatar. i'm trying to get you two comfortable with the idea.polar sky wrote:hahaha! isn't that funny! I totally just did what you just did! hahaha, oh man... wooo. wow, that was good. Hold on hold on... wait wait, a picture of an Avatar action figure! Right? And a picture of
some shitty Canadian Magician! Hahaha, it doesn't have anything to do with the Avatar! Haha, oh man that is good stuff, flat out comedy... can I barrow that? You don't mind? Ok here it goes!
![]()
HAHAHAHAH! Oh man! I did it too! Holy Shit.
Nah, seriously though, I could care less. I will end up seeing it sooner or later. The 3D seems kinda cool.
novayshun wrote:http://web.me.com/pascalboogaert/Site/f ... iginal.jpg
Damn you, I was JUST gonna post that!
I'll see you when the sun sets east, don't forget me.
https://www.instagram.com/powerline_misfortune/
https://www.instagram.com/powerline_misfortune/
- mechanismj
- Nova Scotia Robot
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:35 am
- Contact:
Well, that blew it for me.Twoist wrote:novayshun wrote:http://web.me.com/pascalboogaert/Site/f ... iginal.jpg
Damn you, I was JUST gonna post that!
- Patryk Ludamage
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 5:59 am
- Location: The Soviet Russia, where is vodka, bears and very cold winters
- Contact:
Today i saw the Avatar - just one grate blockbaster for a such humans )
I appreciate 3d style but not in a grate way - only in good )
Story line kinda intersting, music too but "the film of the year" it's hard to call because it's a first film with those technology and it hasn't any opponents
Just a good film - not Grate or Exellent for me )))
I appreciate 3d style but not in a grate way - only in good )
Story line kinda intersting, music too but "the film of the year" it's hard to call because it's a first film with those technology and it hasn't any opponents
Just a good film - not Grate or Exellent for me )))
- dave_from_2001
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 738
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:19 am
http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/ ... index.html
wasn't sure whether to post this in Avatar or Twoism Depression thread
wasn't sure whether to post this in Avatar or Twoism Depression thread
- Synthestesia
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1721
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 11:31 pm
- Location: the place
- Contact:
Wowdave_from_2001 wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/ ... index.html
wasn't sure whether to post this in Avatar or Twoism Depression thread

dave_from_2001 wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/ ... index.html
wasn't sure whether to post this in Avatar or Twoism Depression thread
- mechanismj
- Nova Scotia Robot
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2005 3:35 am
- Contact:
Haha. Now I may have to go see it!polar sky wrote:dave_from_2001 wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/ ... index.html
wasn't sure whether to post this in Avatar or Twoism Depression thread
This movie is a SHAME ! God...
It's a shame for cinema, for S.F, for design, for script, even about the music of my friend James Horner. No originality, it's so kitsch... I'm higly traumatized, i'm a s.f lover, shit IoI
Maybe the movie is a public and critical success because we don't have a good s.f or action movie since a while.
"Thurd" is a compliment for this film.
It's a shame for cinema, for S.F, for design, for script, even about the music of my friend James Horner. No originality, it's so kitsch... I'm higly traumatized, i'm a s.f lover, shit IoI
Maybe the movie is a public and critical success because we don't have a good s.f or action movie since a while.
"Thurd" is a compliment for this film.
Hahaha, oh wow.dave_from_2001 wrote:http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/ ... index.html
wasn't sure whether to post this in Avatar or Twoism Depression thread
Anyhoo, this movie was visually stunning and I enjoyed it. I don't care how lacking of originality it is.
I was beforehand already warned for the plot. Indeed, it wasn't that complicated, but I didn't mind actually. I like every know and then a feel good movie. And with not that much expectations, I wasn't disappointed.
I loved the setting and the visuals. Would like to see more of this world. Maybe not Avatar II but some Planet Earth like stuff would be appreciated. The helicopter lizards were really nice to watch. Music was decent, didn't annoy me, but didn't leave any memory also. Not bad, but also not extraordinary. The only negative points were that 3d gave me a headache (as most 3d movies do) and the 3d looked sometimes more layered than really 3d (hope you get what I mean). And already said before, they took papyrus as Na'vi subtitle font, I guess papyrus is the new comic sans :S
I understand why people get depressed by this movie (although not experiencing it). The flying is close to how I imagine real flying is (or even freedom). Also the unison/intimacy between Na'vi, animals, plant, planet etc can be depressing, especially for lonely people I guess. But that maybe more of a psychological discussion....
Overall I liked the movie a lot.
I loved the setting and the visuals. Would like to see more of this world. Maybe not Avatar II but some Planet Earth like stuff would be appreciated. The helicopter lizards were really nice to watch. Music was decent, didn't annoy me, but didn't leave any memory also. Not bad, but also not extraordinary. The only negative points were that 3d gave me a headache (as most 3d movies do) and the 3d looked sometimes more layered than really 3d (hope you get what I mean). And already said before, they took papyrus as Na'vi subtitle font, I guess papyrus is the new comic sans :S
I understand why people get depressed by this movie (although not experiencing it). The flying is close to how I imagine real flying is (or even freedom). Also the unison/intimacy between Na'vi, animals, plant, planet etc can be depressing, especially for lonely people I guess. But that maybe more of a psychological discussion....
Overall I liked the movie a lot.
Unexpect the expected
- Chuck Beckles
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:12 pm
- Sir Prancelot
- Friendly Stranger
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:08 pm
- Location: Basking In The Hexagon Sun
- Contact:
Yeah, I know right!Fredd-E wrote:Wow Pocahontas is such a rip off from Avatar. Lame Disney!
I saw it twice and I thought that it was THE best movie in the world. Then I found a picture on the internet that was a full plotline of Pocahontas but someone had went through it, scratched out all the proper nouns, and replaced them with ones from Avatar. It lined up perfectly.
Visually, it's still a great movie, but now....
Last edited by Sir Prancelot on Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:52 pm, edited 2 times in total.


