Stry Craty Bya wrote:I really don't care. I just love listening to Boards of Canada. More than any other music, as a matter of fact. So if they say that they're releasing new music; Yes, I'm going to get excited.
normally i used the word "hipster" in extremely lighthearted, loose meaning. partially because i've never gotten a straight answer on just /exactly/ what is and is NOT a hipster. everyone has something different to say about it.
for instance, i often say i dress like a hipster or have hipster hair. but i probably don't.
"grand mistress of the grace note freedledeedee melodies" - Cupz, 2026
i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
way, way, way more.
"grand mistress of the grace note freedledeedee melodies" - Cupz, 2026
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
sevenELIXIR wrote:granglan (sorry if the spelling is wrong) I have to ask.... is your avatar either terrance or philip??
thought the same thing
I had to google 'hipster' to find out in wikipedia that besides a sexy cut of female-underwear it is what we around here used to call 'artyfarty'. Artyfarty however refers to being 'difficult' for the sake of being 'difficult'. One related side-topic is the overflow of digital possibilities making it impossible to decide which possibilities are necessary in a creative process where one results in stacking plugins and tracks just because it's possible, or using video-edits just because the technique permits. Art and demonstration where mistaken in times. I think by now that era is history.
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Exactly.
So what music does this guy listen to then Twoism-ist?
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Exactly.
So what music does this guy listen to then Twoism-ist?
you haven't heard of them
"grand mistress of the grace note freedledeedee melodies" - Cupz, 2026
Twoism-ist wrote:i met a person that i would call pretentious who does not like boards of canada. he calls them "entry-level" and "conventional". does that sound more pretentious than liking boards of canada?
Yep. That smacks of someone categorising BoC by how elitist or difficult their music is, rather than by quality. BoC's great talent is in making something unique and subtly complex that is still profoundly tuneful and listenable. It's a potent combination and why we're all still so fascinated by them.
Exactly.
So what music does this guy listen to then Twoism-ist?
you haven't heard of them
Ha of course! I was thinking I wasn't mainstream for a moment, how stupid am I....