BoC Maxima 2013 Remaster
Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun
Managed to get it second time around, thanksONTHE88 wrote:I can still access it fine. I guess try it again in a few. Also has anyone with the ability to upload this to the twoism server, been able to download this yet? Once its up there, we won't have to deal with all this link messMexicola wrote:Looks like the link is, to coin a technical term, 'tits-up'.
Got to 45% before it froze. Now the page won't open at all
The top 10 reasons why music is compressedPiotr wrote:Unfortunately the remastered version sounds wack. I've just compared it my version of the album and it sounded extremely overcompressed and flat.
Louder doesn't mean better. And I'm a Chris Clark listener if you know what I mean.
Number one: Audiophiles like to complain about compressed music, but they actually prefer it.
- TOYOTAセ
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 12:31 am
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- North by North
- Sherbet Head
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:19 am
There's compressed and there's overcompressed. Loud does always not equal better.jlgui wrote:The top 10 reasons why music is compressedPiotr wrote:Unfortunately the remastered version sounds wack. I've just compared it my version of the album and it sounded extremely overcompressed and flat.
Louder doesn't mean better. And I'm a Chris Clark listener if you know what I mean.
Number one: Audiophiles like to complain about compressed music, but they actually prefer it.
I really enjoy this remastered version.
First, it comes from the orignal lossless rip of the cassette
Second, the running time respects the original one
Third, the transitions between songs are neat
I like very much the Essel version too. But it s not a real remastered version.
It s more for me a reconstructed version because nearly every songs come from other sources like hi score, music etc. When i listen to it, i don t feel to listen the real BoC Maxima.
First, it comes from the orignal lossless rip of the cassette
Second, the running time respects the original one
Third, the transitions between songs are neat
I like very much the Essel version too. But it s not a real remastered version.
It s more for me a reconstructed version because nearly every songs come from other sources like hi score, music etc. When i listen to it, i don t feel to listen the real BoC Maxima.
- depechedaz
- Boqurant
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:12 pm
- Location: kent uk
- Synthetrix
- Eagle Minded
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:58 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Agreed. I listened to this remaster and it sounded too loud and brittle and was not an improvement imhop.Mexicola wrote:There's compressed and there's overcompressed. Loud does always not equal better.jlgui wrote:The top 10 reasons why music is compressedPiotr wrote:Unfortunately the remastered version sounds wack. I've just compared it my version of the album and it sounded extremely overcompressed and flat.
Louder doesn't mean better. And I'm a Chris Clark listener if you know what I mean.
Number one: Audiophiles like to complain about compressed music, but they actually prefer it.
- re-phaelam-ed
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 6:58 am
- Location: Canadian trapped in USA
failjlgui wrote:The top 10 reasons why music is compressedPiotr wrote:Unfortunately the remastered version sounds wack. I've just compared it my version of the album and it sounded extremely overcompressed and flat.
Louder doesn't mean better. And I'm a Chris Clark listener if you know what I mean.
Number one: Audiophiles like to complain about compressed music, but they actually prefer it.
there is compression and there is squashing music to death like LONE used to or VHSHead.
you can "compress" the music with good mixing and EQ.
but when the complaints come about compressed music...generally that means the compression is used to boost the sound, reducing the dynamic range. you lose headroom...you lose a lot of the feel of the tune. you now just have a loud track.
so yes...you can complain about compression. i fucking hate it.
- harpoon dodger
- Dayvan Cowboy
- Posts: 2341
- Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:20 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
So you prefer the sound of my edit of the original cassette ?re-phaelam-ed wrote:failjlgui wrote:The top 10 reasons why music is compressedPiotr wrote:Unfortunately the remastered version sounds wack. I've just compared it my version of the album and it sounded extremely overcompressed and flat.
Louder doesn't mean better. And I'm a Chris Clark listener if you know what I mean.
Number one: Audiophiles like to complain about compressed music, but they actually prefer it.
there is compression and there is squashing music to death like LONE used to or VHSHead.
you can "compress" the music with good mixing and EQ.
but when the complaints come about compressed music...generally that means the compression is used to boost the sound, reducing the dynamic range. you lose headroom...you lose a lot of the feel of the tune. you now just have a loud track.
so yes...you can complain about compression. i fucking hate it.
- Scotronica
- Posts Quantity
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:43 am
- Location: The Pentland Hills - well Oxgangs it's near enough
You can try this version. This is the edit of the original cassette without any remastering :Scotronica wrote:So what is the best version? I must admit I'm finding this one ear piercingly loud.
The 20 tracks FLAC version with correct tags.
Side A :
https://www.dropbox.com/s/heuo9ypnsr859ry/side%20a.zip
Side B :
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ayd2o6r8rrurpao/side%20b.zip

