Haha. Very frustrating article to read. I trust prof curtice (I went to Strathclyde uni!) and he's been spot on before. But the article even mentions the large number of undecided voters, who, because of strange polling questions, can't be included in this total. They've been 30% or more so if even 40% of those join the 40% of existing yes voters, we'd be over the mark by a few percent. There was also another article a few days ago saying statistically it was too close to call at the moment due to the large amount of noise in the poll results. That said - from the perspective of a campaigner, talking about poll results is basically a fruitless waste of effort and we would do better to spend time actually discussing the ideas and facts that support independence.
Haha, Royal Bank, good riddance. The last thing we need is to bail them out again. They're 80% owned by the British Government at the moment and as we would be splitting assets we would end up owning our 6%-ish I'm sure, so maybe we can help them out with some of the money we save from our cutbacks on things like illegal wars and nuclear weapons. I also am hopeful for sensible cutbacks on state welfare (i.e. take the absurd amount of money that we give to scroungers who don't deserve it*, and give it to impoverished families / disabled people / the NHS / others who need it.) Anyway, one of them credit agencies said our financial services industry could be doing with downsizing which would improve our lender rating. Win win!
Also, I particularly dislike at the end where it says "Salmomd is winning over voters". Grassroots campaigners are winning over voters. If we left it to the politicians we would have fuck all hope of ever achieving anything. Or at least, that's my experience of democracy in the United Kingdom :p
*
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/mi ... ers-385035
http://politicalscrapbook.net/2011/05/m ... fit-fraud/