happy cycling version 2 or 3?

Moderators: Aesthetics, Drones, Hexagon Sun

Post a reply
User avatar
hexagon son
Happy Cycler
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta

happy cycling version 2 or 3?

Post by hexagon son »

http://afxlive.watmm.com/boardsofcanada ... nknown.mp3

sounds different than the cd versions. discuss. this is awesome, been craving a new BoC tune that i hadnt yet heard.
"It's been a long time..."
boardsofdublin
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1872
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Dublin

Post by boardsofdublin »

sounds like just someone messing around with it. where did you get it anyway?
Image
Image
User avatar
hexagon son
Happy Cycler
Posts: 3254
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:17 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta

Post by hexagon son »

watmm, but i dont think its been messed with, its like some elements have been accentuated and others have been taken away. check their important forum threads in boards of canada.
"It's been a long time..."
User avatar
zander two
Sherbet Head
Posts: 781
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 4:42 am

Post by zander two »

I believe this is the version from the Peel Session broadcast. There was thread about this but it's buried deep in the forum somewhere. Yes it is different from the standard version, most notably the ending. Interestingly enough, as noted in the aforementioned thread, there's a page somewhere on the BBC site that calls this track "Happy Cycling (as changed from Bad Day)." 8)
User avatar
niknak
Sherbet Head
Posts: 525
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 12:02 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by niknak »

Yeah i can confirm that. Here's the thread where it came up first time.

http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1135

I was surprised at the time that it wasn't more of a big deal here on twoism. After all the version on the Peel Session EP is just the album version, and here the original broadcast version turned up and was quite a bit different. I thought it was quite a discovery. And of course posed the question why the MHTRTC version is on the EP and not this one. Were they unsatisfied with this version? Or was it just a cock up in mastering?
boardsofdublin
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1872
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Dublin

Post by boardsofdublin »

niknak wrote:Yeah i can confirm that. Here's the thread where it came up first time.

http://www.twoism.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1135

I was surprised at the time that it wasn't more of a big deal here on twoism. After all the version on the Peel Session EP is just the album version, and here the original broadcast version turned up and was quite a bit different. I thought it was quite a discovery. And of course posed the question why the MHTRTC version is on the EP and not this one. Were they unsatisfied with this version? Or was it just a cock up in mastering?
i would say a deffo cock up in mastering.
Image
Image
User avatar
monochrome
Boqurant
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:01 pm

Post by monochrome »

does anyone have a link to the whole broadcast? All the yousendit links in the original thread have expired. and were the links to this happy cycling the same in that old thread as the one on watmm?
Last edited by monochrome on Wed Mar 07, 2007 4:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
audiotrack
Eagle Minded
Posts: 435
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 7:28 pm

Post by audiotrack »

The CD version track length is 7:56

Does anyone have the track length of this version..?
boardsofdublin
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1872
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 6:58 pm
Location: Dublin

Post by boardsofdublin »

audiotrack wrote:The CD version track length is 7:56

Does anyone have the track length of this version..?
7.56.

i am not convinced!! its the same track, just went wrong when first played. Hence, why it was never played on air.

thats just my opinion.
Image
Image
sevenism
Friendly Stranger
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:19 pm
Contact:

Post by sevenism »

boardsofdublin wrote:
audiotrack wrote:The CD version track length is 7:56

Does anyone have the track length of this version..?
7.56.

i am not convinced!! its the same track, just went wrong when first played. Hence, why it was never played on air.

thats just my opinion.
The version I've got is 6:51. It's the same file as posted on watmm. It doesn't sound too different to me either though.
User avatar
The Other
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 2372
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 10:17 pm
Location: Things Betwixt

Post by The Other »

i still like the 7:56 version better...
User avatar
hills west
Dayvan Cowboy
Posts: 1006
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:14 pm

Post by hills west »

oh awesome, the first version of this song..ive been looking for this since i lost it back in like 02...where did you find it?
Post a reply